<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Listen to the Orchestra &#8230;</title>
	<link>http://www.fauxharmonic.com</link>
	<description>Serving Orchestral Composers Since 2003</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 04:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: YuHirà</title>
		<link>http://www.fauxharmonic.com/now-playing/#comment-31871</link>
		<dc:creator>YuHirà</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 18:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fauxharmonic.com/now-playing/#comment-31871</guid>
		<description>Dear Mark Goretsky

In my opinion what you're claiming here is wrong. Digital photography doesn't recreate reality: it's just a new way to record the reality. In music, it happened a long time ago:we digitally record music and nobody feels it's a problem. What Fauxharmonic does here - orchestra emulation - is more than recording. In my mind, emulation has rather to be compared with computer graphics. 

Well, but 3D techniques are far away from realism. And music emulation is likewise far away from realism. Fauxharmonic sounds don't depart from the rules in my opinion. I'm not convinced at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mark Goretsky</p>
<p>In my opinion what you&#8217;re claiming here is wrong. Digital photography doesn&#8217;t recreate reality: it&#8217;s just a new way to record the reality. In music, it happened a long time ago:we digitally record music and nobody feels it&#8217;s a problem. What Fauxharmonic does here - orchestra emulation - is more than recording. In my mind, emulation has rather to be compared with computer graphics. </p>
<p>Well, but 3D techniques are far away from realism. And music emulation is likewise far away from realism. Fauxharmonic sounds don&#8217;t depart from the rules in my opinion. I&#8217;m not convinced at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ion Muniz</title>
		<link>http://www.fauxharmonic.com/now-playing/#comment-24602</link>
		<dc:creator>Ion Muniz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fauxharmonic.com/now-playing/#comment-24602</guid>
		<description>I'm impressed by what these guys were able to accomplish. I was a teacher at Sibelius-Akatemia, in Helsinki. There was a studio that used to make the music for the guys that wrote music for orchestra. It was just tto have an idea of how it would sound. What I hear is amazing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m impressed by what these guys were able to accomplish. I was a teacher at Sibelius-Akatemia, in Helsinki. There was a studio that used to make the music for the guys that wrote music for orchestra. It was just tto have an idea of how it would sound. What I hear is amazing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Goretsky</title>
		<link>http://www.fauxharmonic.com/now-playing/#comment-23914</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Goretsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 15:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fauxharmonic.com/now-playing/#comment-23914</guid>
		<description>People who rebel today against digital enhancements of music should remember what happened to those who rebelled against digital photography that eventually triumphed. No doubt the same outcome will be with music. And here is only one reason/example for this. 
Yesterday I was listening on the radio for the orchestrated version of Beethoven's Quartet #14. Every element - the orchestral arrangement, conducting, and the Orchestra itself - were famous on their own. But result was mediocre. Enlarged group from four instrumentalists to some 20 or more added very unpleasant noise to the music. This wouldn't happen with digitized music--it would remain clear and enjoyable. Namely such absence of noise allowed me to guess correctly the "digitized" Beethoven. And I wish I could control the acoustical performance of my stereo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People who rebel today against digital enhancements of music should remember what happened to those who rebelled against digital photography that eventually triumphed. No doubt the same outcome will be with music. And here is only one reason/example for this.<br />
Yesterday I was listening on the radio for the orchestrated version of Beethoven&#8217;s Quartet #14. Every element - the orchestral arrangement, conducting, and the Orchestra itself - were famous on their own. But result was mediocre. Enlarged group from four instrumentalists to some 20 or more added very unpleasant noise to the music. This wouldn&#8217;t happen with digitized music&#8211;it would remain clear and enjoyable. Namely such absence of noise allowed me to guess correctly the &#8220;digitized&#8221; Beethoven. And I wish I could control the acoustical performance of my stereo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Goretsky</title>
		<link>http://www.fauxharmonic.com/now-playing/#comment-23605</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Goretsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fauxharmonic.com/now-playing/#comment-23605</guid>
		<description>Dear Mr. Paul Smith, I was pleased and excited listening to all samples you generously provided on this site. I love all of them. I have been listening to classical/serious music for over 50 years and think you should be proud of such a great achievement--that clear and so natural (woody!)sound of the strings!
Great music, great interpretation, great sound!

Best wishes to the you and Fauxharmonic Orchestra,

Mark Goretsky</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mr. Paul Smith, I was pleased and excited listening to all samples you generously provided on this site. I love all of them. I have been listening to classical/serious music for over 50 years and think you should be proud of such a great achievement&#8211;that clear and so natural (woody!)sound of the strings!<br />
Great music, great interpretation, great sound!</p>
<p>Best wishes to the you and Fauxharmonic Orchestra,</p>
<p>Mark Goretsky</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
